Search for: "Niagara Insulations" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
The only remaining defendants at trial were Garlock Sealing Technologies and Niagara Insulation. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Retired administrators [Plaintiffs] who were employed by Niagara Falls City School District alleged that the School District was in breach of contract with respect to its providing health insurance to these retirees.The Appellate Division noted that the parties did not dispute that the language at issue in the various CBAs is unambiguous and, at oral argument, the School District had conceded that this case is controlled by Kolbe v Tibbetts (22 NY3d 344). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:10 am
Garlock Sealing Technologies was ‘deprived of its right to a fair trial' because it did not know its co-defendant in an asbestos exposure case, Niagara Insulations Inc., had reached a high-low agreement with the plaintiff, the court ruled unanimously in Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation, 89. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 7:19 am by John Floyd
The robe simply insulates them from accountability when they shame, disgrace, or destroy the confidence in what the robe stands for. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Niagara Regional Police Service demonstrated that this exemption may not apply where the plaintiff cannot demonstrate that they were a victim. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
For some reason, we recently found ourselves comparing our favorite defenses to our favorite rock bands. [read post]